American Woodcocks feeding, with video

 

An American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) works the mudflat, bill caked with mire. On July 12, Shauna and I made an early morning visit to a nearby hotspot, Glacier Ridge Metro Park in Union County, Ohio. We had visited this site a few days prior with the aim of shooting dragonflies in flight. That foray met with some success, but the bird life was so interesting that we focused on avifauna on the 7/12/2025 foray.

Especially notable were up to five American Woodcocks feeding out on the mudflat, sometimes venturing quite close. While I made the image above with my Canon 800mm f/5.6 (as with the others), I barely had to crop this photo and at times the bird wandered inside the 14-foot minimum focus distance of the lens. Needless to say, it was a wonderful opportunity to observe woodcocks busily feeding, and that's what we concentrated on.

A woodcock tugs a long, elastic worm from the muck. Sorry, I do not know the species or even group that the "worm" belongs to, but whatever they are there are plenty of them. We saw and photographed many such captures.

Apparently, no one is quite sure how woodcocks divine the location of subterranean worms. Visually? By sound or vibration? Rooting about in the mire with their sensitive bill tips? Probably a combination of these, and who knows whatever else, I would say.

Sometimes it would appear that a bird would spot something, move quickly towards it, plunge its bill into the soil, root around, and extract a worm. Other times the woodcock would clearly be engaged in exploratory probing, plunging its bill deep into the ground, searching with rapid sewing machine-like motions. Then, apparently when prey was detected, it would freeze for a bit, and we knew it was likely that a worm would soon be pulled above ground.

Woodcocks can move the upper bill mandible independently, allowing the bird to open the tip and grasp objects under the ground and sight unseen. The terminal end of the upper mandible is also beset with sensitive nerve endings, aiding the bird in tactile sensory recognition.

I was fascinated by this woodcock duo and spent much time keeping tabs on them. Photos were tough due to the distance, but documentary shots such as the one above were possible. Note that the just captured worm is being held in the bills of both birds! This was not an anomaly, I saw the same scene play out at least a dozen times and got images of probably a half-dozen different episodes of this joint feeding behavior.

Virtually all of the literature that I have seen describes the American Woodcock as completely solitary, at nearly all times of year. The pair only forms a brief union to mate, then the male goes his own way. Apparently the same is true for feeding behavior, and the other woodcocks that were present did maintain good distances from one another,

One might wonder if one of the birds is a juvenile, and the other the mother. But that would seem highly unlikely. Woodcock chicks can forage for food within 3-4 days of hatching, and maternal care ends after a week or so, apparently. By this point in their development, the parental bond should be long broken.

I wonder if it might be some sort of communal feeding strategy in that the participation of both birds ups the odds of finding food. The two birds rarely got any further apart than the distance in that photo, and often both of them had their bills buried in the same immediate vicinity. As near as I could tell, only one bird would eat the worm - they never appeared to pull it apart so that each got a piece. And both birds captured food, not just one.

Anyway, it's normally about impossible to watch feeding woodcocks in typical brushy/grassy/otherwise thickly vegetated habitat, so there may be feeding strategies that we don't know about.

Or perhaps I'm just missing something obvious. If you can shed light on this behavior, please leave a comment.

Finally, here's a video of a feeding American Woodcock, as it sashays about with its distinctive, comical gait.

Nature: Rattlesnakes are not something to be greatly feared

 

A timber rattlesnake is coiled in a greenbrier thicket/Jim McCormac

Nature: Rattlesnakes are not something to be greatly feared

July 6, 2025

Ophidiophobia (fear of snakes) is very common, and people take that to extremes with rattlesnakes, which are much persecuted.

Essentially, people and timber rattlesnakes do not mix, although the failure to abide one another is mostly the fault of humans. In essence, to conserve a fascinating part of Ohio’s biodiversity, we must have very large spaces mostly free of humans, and fortunately we do, thanks in major part to the Ohio Department of Natural Resources and The Nature Conservancy.

On June 21, Shauna Weyrauch and I met up with snake researcher John Howard in a remote southern Ohio locale. Our mission? Tracking a big old timber rattlesnake that had been fitted with a radio transmitter. It was uphill all the way as we gradually ascended to a dry oak-hickory ridgetop via switchback trails.

After maybe three-quarters of a mile, Howard fired up his receiver to check for feedback from the snake. Nothing, so we moved ever higher up the trail. Finally, nearly a mile in, we picked up faint beeps and honed in on our quarry. Nearly a mile and half from our starting point, we reached ground zero.

The transmitter beeps came loud and fast, and Howard pointed to a brushy tangle about 12 feet away and said, “There it is.”

We glanced over to see a 4-foot rattler slowly slithering away and moved in. The snake froze, as they usually do when they know they’ve been made by people. Timber rattlesnakes rely on excellent camouflage patterning to blend in with their surroundings.

In this case, we had no need to capture or handle the snake; the mission was purely to monitor its whereabouts. Howard had earlier relocated the animal to this locale, as it was headed to some habitations where residents were known to be decidedly unfriendly to rattlers. He was pleased to see that it was remaining in the wildlands.

This was about the 15th timber rattlesnake that I’ve seen, and it was one of the most impressive. It measured about 4 feet in length and probably weighed over 3 pounds. Howard estimated its age at 30 years or so.

One of the most impressive aspects of an old rattlesnake is the girth. The middle section of its body had a greater circumference than Arnold Schwarzenegger’s forearms at his prime.

After a bit, the snake, in a rare show of agitation, began rattling. From my experience, if not unduly bothered, they seldom do this. It gave us an opportunity to hear the surprisingly loud buzzing created by the rattles.

We soon decided our reptilian buddy had enough of our act and back down the mountain we went, pleased the snake was staying in unpeopled hinterlands.

There are only three venomous (not poisonous) snakes in the state, and only the copperhead can be locally common in parts of southern and eastern Ohio. Our other rattlesnake, the eastern massasauga, is a rare inhabitant of wet prairies, fens and other high-quality wetlands.

Deaths from venomous snake bites are virtually unheard of, especially in this day and age, due to better medical care and antivenoms. While the larger timber rattlesnake packs more of a punch than copperheads or massasaugas, bites are exceedingly rare.

One case happened on July 12, 1947, near Chillicothe in Ross County. Mary Ann Butterbaugh was struck by a rattlesnake that had hidden in her garden. She received prompt medical treatment, seemed to be recovering, but died six days later. Hers is the last known death by a venomous snake in Ohio.

Unlike people, chipmunks, mice, squirrels and other small mammals are justified in worrying about timber rattlesnake bites. Such animals are the snakes’ stock in trade.

Prior to European settlement, when Ohio was 95% forested, timber rattlesnakes would have been common nearly statewide. With the advent of settlement and ever more people, the snakes and their habitat suffered greatly. Now, only relict populations persist in a half-dozen southcentral counties.

I suppose many people would wonder why we would even want to conserve an animal like the timber rattlesnake. As I have heard more than a few times, when speaking of lesser-loved creatures, “What good is it?”

I always want to reply, “What good are you?” The time is long past for people to persecute those things they don’t like, or for which they see no personal value for and accept that other creatures have intrinsic value in addition to ecological value.

We have laid waste to enormous swaths of habitat and caused the disappearance or endangerment of scores of plants and animals. Over 99% of the original prairies are gone.

Well over 90% of Ohio’s original wetlands have been drained or otherwise destroyed. Most of our woodlands have been cut and developed, and most that remain are badly fragmented.

Intact large-scale vestiges of our forested past are all too rare, and there is no better symbol of wooded wilderness than the timber rattlesnake.

Naturalist Jim McCormac writes a column for The Dispatch on the first and third Sundays of the month. He also writes about nature at jim mccormac.blogspot.com.

Reddish-brown Stag Beetles: A Boom Year?

 

Needless to say, we were quite pleased with the appearance of this Reddish-brown Stag Beetle (Lucanus capreolus) on the evening of June 21, 2025. A group of us were at John Howard's place in Adams County, Ohio, mothing, and the beetle came into the illuminated sheet, as they sometimes do.

Face on with the formidable bug. Stag beetles are among our more impressive coleopterans and generally garner a reaction when they appear. I've heard from a number of people regarding sightings this summer, and it would seem that the beetles may be experiencing a boom year, as they sometimes do.

CLICK HERE to read a column I wrote about an irruption of stag beetles back in 2017.

And if you want to see the holy grail of stag beetles, at least in this part of the world, CLICK HERE.